Lately we hear some say that we should have more civility in politics.
Well, maybe………it depends on the definition of “civility.” Merriam-Webster defines civility as: “a polite act or expression.”
Let’s all agree that name-calling, personal ridicule or the use of vile language is always out of order. We can all agree that when a political discourse degenerates to that level, it is usually due to the fact that the perpetrator has no valid argument and resorts to this poor behavior in frustration and anger.
Recently, President Obama, speaking at the annual National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, D.C. said:
“Surely you can question my policies without questioning my faith or, for that matter, my citizenship.”
But is the public confrontation of inaccurate statement(s), failed policies or the questioning of motives of a public servant uncivil? Is the factual publication of a lawmakers voting record on an issue to his constituents uncivil? Is the passionate public criticism of a lawmaker’s statements uncivil?
I contend that all of these are not only civil and appropriate, but NECESSARY.
***Ed Randazzo, is a nationally syndicated author. He has been a conservative activist and consultant for over 30 years and is currently the Chief News Editor of Life and Liberty Media***
6 comments for “Civility in Politics”